Update captions and labels.
This commit is contained in:
parent
df699e0ea0
commit
0ceeb7a273
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
@ -192,13 +192,13 @@ expected magnetization per spin.
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/phase_transition/fox/wide/10M/energy.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{$\langle \epsilon \rangle$ for $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, $10^{6}$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\caption{Expected energy per spin $\langle \epsilon \rangle$ for temperatures $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, and $10^{6}$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\label{fig:phase_energy_1M}
|
||||
\end{figure} %
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/phase_transition/fox/wide/10M/magnetization.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{$\langle |m| \rangle$ for $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, $10^{6}$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\caption{Expected magnetization per spin $\langle |m| \rangle$ for temperatures $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, and $10^{6}$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\label{fig:phase_magnetization_1M}
|
||||
\end{figure} %
|
||||
In Figure \ref{fig:phase_heat_1M} we show heat capacity, and in Figure \ref{fig:phase_susceptibility_1M}
|
||||
@ -206,13 +206,13 @@ the magnetic susceptibility.
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/phase_transition/fox/wide/10M/heat_capacity.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{$C_{V}$ for $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, $10^{6}$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\caption{Heat capacity $C_{V}$ for temperatures $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, and $10^{6}$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\label{fig:phase_heat_1M}
|
||||
\end{figure} %
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/phase_transition/fox/wide/10M/susceptibility.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{$\chi$ for $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, $10^{6}$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\caption{Magnetic susceptibility $\chi$ for temperatures $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, and $10^{6}$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\label{fig:phase_susceptibility_1M}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ of Var$(\epsilon) = 0.0001$. %
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/pd_estimate_1_0.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{Histogram $T = 1.0 J / k_{B}$}
|
||||
\caption{Distribution of values of energy per spin, when temperature is $T = 1.0 J / k_{B}$}
|
||||
\label{fig:histogram_1_0}
|
||||
\end{figure} %
|
||||
In Figure \ref{fig:histogram_2_4}, for $T_{2}$, the samples of energy per spin is
|
||||
@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ centered around the expectation value $\langle \epsilon \rangle = -1.2370$. %
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/pd_estimate_2_4.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{Histogram $T = 2.4 J / k_{B}$}
|
||||
\caption{Distribution of values of energy per spin, when temperature is $T = 2.4 J / k_{B}$}
|
||||
\label{fig:histogram_2_4}
|
||||
\end{figure} %
|
||||
However, we observed a higher variance of Var$(\epsilon) = 0.0203$. When the temperature
|
||||
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ increase in $\langle \epsilon \rangle$ in the temperature range $T \in [2.25, 2.
|
||||
\begin{figure}
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/phase_transition/fox/wide/10M/energy.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{$\langle \epsilon \rangle$ for $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, $10^7$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\caption{Expected energy per spin $\langle \epsilon \rangle$ for temperatures $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, and $10^7$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\label{fig:phase_energy_10M}
|
||||
\end{figure} %
|
||||
We observe a decrease in $\langle |m| \rangle$ for the same temperature range in
|
||||
@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ however, there is a loss of magnetization close to the critical temperature.
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/phase_transition/fox/wide/10M/magnetization.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{$\langle |m| \rangle$ for $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, $10^7$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\caption{Expected magnetization per spin $\langle |m| \rangle$ for temperatures $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, and $10^7$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\label{fig:phase_magnetization_10M}
|
||||
\end{figure} %
|
||||
In Figure \ref{fig:phase_heat_10M}, we observe an increase in heat capacity in the
|
||||
@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ value of heat capacity when the lattice size increase.
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/phase_transition/fox/wide/10M/heat_capacity.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{$C_{V}$ for $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, $10^7$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\caption{Heat capacity $C_{V}$ for temperatures $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, and $10^7$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\label{fig:phase_heat_10M}
|
||||
\end{figure} %
|
||||
The magnetic susceptibility in Figure \ref{fig:phase_susceptibility_10M}, shows
|
||||
@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ sharper when we increase lattice size, we are moving closer to the critical temp
|
||||
\begin{figure}[H]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{../images/phase_transition/fox/wide/10M/susceptibility.pdf}
|
||||
\caption{$\chi$ for $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, $10^7$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\caption{Magnetic susceptibility $\chi$ for temperatures $T \in [2.1, 2.4]$, and $10^7$ MC cycles.}
|
||||
\label{fig:phase_susceptibility_10M}
|
||||
\end{figure} %
|
||||
% Add something about the correlation length?
|
||||
|
||||
@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ def plot_phase_transition_alt(indir, outdir):
|
||||
ax1.legend(title="Lattice size", loc="upper right")
|
||||
|
||||
ax2.set_xlabel(r"T $(J/k_{B})$")
|
||||
ax2.set_ylabel(r"$\langle |m| \rangle$ $(unitless)$")
|
||||
ax2.set_ylabel(f"$\\langle |m| \\rangle$ (unitless)")
|
||||
ax2.legend(title="Lattice size", loc="upper right")
|
||||
|
||||
ax3.set_xlabel(r"T $(J/k_{B})$")
|
||||
@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ def plot_phase_transition(indir, outdir):
|
||||
ax1.legend(title="Lattice size", loc="upper right")
|
||||
|
||||
ax2.set_xlabel(r"T $(J/k_{B})$")
|
||||
ax2.set_ylabel(r"$\langle |m| \rangle$ $(unitless)$")
|
||||
ax2.set_ylabel(r"$\langle |m| \rangle$ (unitless)")
|
||||
ax2.legend(title="Lattice size", loc="upper right")
|
||||
|
||||
ax3.set_xlabel(r"T $(J/k_{B})$")
|
||||
|
||||
@ -84,6 +84,8 @@ I suggest we leave it out for now, I'll comment it out in case we want to use it
|
||||
[x] 89: onordered => unordered
|
||||
[ ] 97: More accurately, we generated 10M samples per temperature point.
|
||||
True, so "...$10$ million samples of spin configurations for lattices..." => "...$10$ million samples of spin configurations, per temperature, for lattices..."
|
||||
[ ] 77: Approve change "Histogram $T = 1.0 J / k_{B}$" => "Distribution of values of energy per spin, when temperature is $T = 1.0 J / k_{B}$"
|
||||
[ ] 85: Approve change "Histogram $T = 2.4 J / k_{B}$" => "Distribution of values of energy per spin, when temperature is $T = 1.0 J / k_{B}$"
|
||||
[x] 100: Should be that the program allocated, so that the reader understands that it does the division automatically.
|
||||
I agree!
|
||||
[x] 101: thread => threads
|
||||
@ -91,6 +93,7 @@ I agree!
|
||||
So instead of "We ran a profiler" it should be "We used a profiler"? Could you suggest a way of formulating the sentence so that the info is correct?
|
||||
[ ] 106: was => were
|
||||
My previous comment might make this unnecessary?
|
||||
[ ] 113: Included description of variables in caption
|
||||
[x] 116: deacrese => decrease
|
||||
[x] 117: "suggesting the system ..." => "suggesting that the system ...".
|
||||
[x] 118: increase => increases. "The system energy" is singular.
|
||||
@ -113,3 +116,5 @@ Haha, ofc we did!
|
||||
I agree, that sound a lot better! I just ended up wtiting something somewhat descriptive in lack of words.
|
||||
[x] 130: he => the
|
||||
Also, I changed the Eq. => to Equation
|
||||
|
||||
[x] 188: General, Included captions for figures in section
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user